Prescription of Crime
36. Recebido vs. People, 346 SCRA 881 (2000)
Student: G-one T. Paisones
Professor: Atty. Cisco Franz S. Maclang
Facts:
On
September 9, 1990, private complainant CaridadDorol went to the house of her
cousin, petitioner AnicetoRecebido, at San Isidro, Bacon,Sorsogon to redeem her
property, an agricultural land located at San Isidro, Bacon, Sorsogon, which
Caridad mortgaged to petitioner sometime in April of 1985. Petitioner and
Caridad did not execute a document on the mortgage but Caridad instead gave
petitioner a copy of the Deed of Sale dated June 16, 1973 executed in her favor
by her father, Juan Dorol.
In said confrontation, petitioner refused to allow Caridad to redeem her property on his claim that she had sold her property to him in 1979. Caridad maintained and insisted that the transaction between them involving her property was a mortgage.
In said confrontation, petitioner refused to allow Caridad to redeem her property on his claim that she had sold her property to him in 1979. Caridad maintained and insisted that the transaction between them involving her property was a mortgage.
Caridad
verified from the Office of the Assessor in Sorsogon that there exists on its
file a Deed of Sale dated August 13, 1979, allegedly executed by Caridad l in
favor of petitioner and that the property was registered in the latter's
name. After comparison of the specimen signatures of Caridad in other
documents with that of the signature of Caridad on the questioned Deed of Sale,
NBI Document Examiner Antonio Magbojas, found that the latter signature was
falsified.
CaridadDorol filed her complaint against petitioner Aniceto with the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), Legaspi City and its Questioned Documents Division conducted an examination in the original copy of the Deed of Sale in question allegedly signed by Caridad, particularly her signature affixed thereon.
CaridadDorol filed her complaint against petitioner Aniceto with the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), Legaspi City and its Questioned Documents Division conducted an examination in the original copy of the Deed of Sale in question allegedly signed by Caridad, particularly her signature affixed thereon.
Issue:
Whether
or not the crime charged had already prescribed at the time the information was
filed.
Held:
No.
Ratio:
Under
Article 91 of the Revised Penal Code, the period of prescription shall
"commence to run from the day on which the crime is discovered by the
offended party, the authorities, or their agents, x xx." In People v. Reyes,[12]this
Court has declared that registration in public registry is a notice to the
whole world. The record is constructive notice of its contents as well as
all interests, legal and equitable, included therein. All persons are
charged with knowledge of what it contains.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento