Mistake of Facts vs. Mistake of Identity vs. Mistake in the Blow vs. Injurious result is greater than that intended

	Mistake of Facts	Mistake of Identity	Mistake in the Blow	Injurious result is greater than that intended
Latin Name	Ignorantia facti excusat	Error in personae	Aberratio ictus	Praeter intentionem
Meaning	-is an absolutory cause for had the facts been true to the belief of the offender	injuring one person mistaken for another	When offender intending to do an injury to one person actually inflicts it on another	injurious result is greater than that  intended
Circumstances Affecting Criminal Liability	Negative criminal Liability	Penalty for lesser crime in its maximum period Art. 49 (Extenuating Circumstance)	penalty for graver offense in its maximum period Art. 48	Mitigating circumstance Art. 13
As to Count	There was a crime but no criminal	Single Crime	Complex crimes Art. 48	Single Crime
Persons Involve	One subject	One subject	At least two subjects	one subject
Intent	No criminal intent	A has intent to kill B, but kills C	The intended subject is a different subject, but the felony is still the same.	Lack of intent to commit so grave a wrong
Criminal Liability	No criminal liability	Has criminal liability	Has criminal liability	Has criminal liability
Landmark Case	U.S. vs. Ah Chong	People vs. Oannis	People vs. Mabugat	People vs. Cagoco
Exceptions / Notes	Mistake of fact is relevant only in dolo	Of the same gravity or severity, the penalty is not mitigated.	May result to a greater criminal liability	Mitigating only if there is a notable disparity between the means employed and the resulting felony.