Linggo, Oktubre 22, 2017

US vs. Parrone, 24 Phil 29 (Digest)

Retroactive Effect of Penal Law

1. US vs. Parrone, 24 Phil 29

Facts:
Parrone was found guilty of the falsification of cedula and sentenced him to be imprisoned for a period of three years and to pay a fine of P200, and in case of insolvency to suffer subsidiary imprisonment, in accordance with the provisions of section 55 of Act No. 1189.
The crime was committed by Parrone was amended by (Act No. 2126), which give the accused favorable conditions.

Issue:
            Whether or not, Act. 2126 should be given retroactive effect in so far as they favor the accused?

Held:
            Yes.

Ratio:
The provisions of article 22 of the Penal Code, however, penal laws shall have a retroactive effect in so far as they favor the person guilty of a felony or misdemeanor, even though at the time of the promulgation of such laws a final sentence has been pronounced and the convict is serving same.


Student: G-one T. Paisones

Professor: Atty. Cisco Franz S. Maclang

Walang komento:

Mag-post ng isang Komento

Taxation Reviewer [Prescription on Government’s Right to Assess Taxes and Collection]

      Taxation reviewer: Prescription on Government’s Right to Assess Taxes and its collection.     1. What is the General rule as t...